View the recording of the 2021 Virtual National OFR Mid-Year Meeting: From the Field—Unifying Policy and Practice Standards.
The OFR/PHAST video 360° Overdose Data to Action explains to any audience using the Public Health and Safety Team (PHAST) framework or implementing overdose fatality reviews how and why a comprehensive (360 degree) approach to overdose prevention incorporates both strategies. See it here.
The Legislative Analysis and Public Policy Association (LAPPA), in partnership with the Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR), developed information sharing fact sheets to provide OFR teams an understanding of what members legally can and cannot share in regard to federal law (such as 42 C.F.R. and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA]). View the fact sheets here.
The “Overdose Fatality Review Start-Up Resources” overview is now available.
Access it here.
The purpose of an OFR is to effectively identify system gaps and innovative community-specific overdose prevention and intervention strategies.
In practice, OFRs involve a series of confidential individual death reviews by a multidisciplinary team. A death review (also referred to as a “case review”) examines a decedent’s life cycle in terms of drug use history, comorbidity, major health events, social-emotional trauma (including adverse childhood experiences), encounters with law enforcement and the criminal justice system, treatment history, and other factors, including local conditions to facilitate a deeper understanding of the missed opportunities for prevention and intervention that may have prevented an overdose death.
By conducting a series of OFRs, jurisdictions begin to see patterns of need and opportunity, not only within specific agencies, but across systems.
Blending input from public health, public safety, providers, and the community, OFR teams develop program and policy recommendations to improve coordination and collaboration between agencies and community conditions to prevent future overdose deaths.
These recommendations are presented to a governing committee that supports and provides resources for implementation and a framework for accountability for action. Examples of successful recommendations include the integration of peer recovery specialists into new settings, targeted naloxone distribution, and improved coordination of public safety and public health.
This guide is a companion document to the CDC Foundation’s Public Health and Safety Team (PHAST) Toolkit and was created to help communities plan, implement, and evaluate OFRs. It is designed for multiple audiences including public health, public safety, criminal justice, drug treatment, and social services.
The goal of the guide is to provide the reader with the needed information to build a successful OFR process with a strong foundation in coalition, data collection, and prevention. The guide content draws on other fatality reviews and the authors’ practice-based knowledge. It is organized into five modules:
Are Overdose deaths preventable?
Yes. Overdose deaths can be prevented with coordinated prevention strategies, timely implementation of evidence-based interventions, community mobilization, and supportive families and friends.
The shared understanding that overdose deaths are preventable guides the entire overdose fatality review (OFR) process. Federal agencies, such as the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are strategically coordinating to mobilize local communities to develop and implement OFRs.